Re: Any better plan for this query?..

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kenneth Marshall
Тема Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Дата
Msg-id 20090506143446.GL23405@it.is.rice.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Any better plan for this query?..  (Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Any better plan for this query?..  (Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:38:59AM +0200, Dimitri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any idea if there is a more optimal execution plan possible for this query:
>
> select S.REF as stref, S.NAME as stnm, H.HORDER as hord, H.BEGIN_DATE as hbeg,
>         H.END_DATE as hend, H.NOTE as hnote
>          from HISTORY H, STAT S
>          where S.REF = H.REF_STAT
>          and H.REF_OBJECT = '0000000001'
>          order by H.HORDER ;
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output on 8.4:
>                                                                    QUERY PLAN
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Sort  (cost=4549.75..4555.76 rows=2404 width=176) (actual
> time=1.341..1.343 rows=20 loops=1)
>    Sort Key: h.horder
>    Sort Method:  quicksort  Memory: 30kB
>    ->  Hash Join  (cost=33.50..4414.75 rows=2404 width=176) (actual
> time=1.200..1.232 rows=20 loops=1)
>          Hash Cond: (h.ref_stat = s.ref)
>          ->  Index Scan using history_ref_idx on history h
> (cost=0.00..4348.20 rows=2404 width=135) (actual time=0.042..0.052
> rows=20 loops=1)
>                Index Cond: (ref_object = '0000000001'::bpchar)
>          ->  Hash  (cost=21.00..21.00 rows=1000 width=45) (actual
> time=1.147..1.147 rows=1000 loops=1)
>                ->  Seq Scan on stat s  (cost=0.00..21.00 rows=1000
> width=45) (actual time=0.005..0.325 rows=1000 loops=1)
>  Total runtime: 1.442 ms
> (10 rows)
>
> Table HISTORY contains 200M rows, only 20 needed
> Table STAT contains 1000 rows, only 20 needed to be joined to HISTORY values.
>
> Table definitions:
> """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
> create table STAT
> (
>     REF                 CHAR(3)            not null,
>     NAME                CHAR(40)           not null,
>     NUMB                INT                not null
> );
>
> create table HISTORY
> (
>     REF_OBJECT          CHAR(10)              not null,
>     HORDER              INT                   not null,
>     REF_STAT            CHAR(3)               not null,
>     BEGIN_DATE          CHAR(12)              not null,
>     END_DATE            CHAR(12)                      ,
>     NOTE                CHAR(100)
> );
>
> create unique index stat_ref_idx on STAT( ref );
> create index history_ref_idx on HISTORY( ref_object, horder );
> """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>
> NOTE: The same query runs 2 times faster on MySQL.
>
> Any idea?..
>
> Rgds,
> -Dimitri
>
Dimitri,

Is there any chance of profiling the postgres backend to see
where the time is used?

Just an idea,
Ken

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Следующее
От: Dimitri
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any better plan for this query?..