Re: currval, lastval, nextvar?
От | Andreas Kretschmer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: currval, lastval, nextvar? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090423161739.GA8570@tux обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: currval, lastval, nextvar? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: currval, lastval, nextvar?
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com> writes: > > Yes. You don't need call nextval. > > Well, you do, but the point is that the default expression for a > serial column includes the nextval() call. Look at the table with > \d, eg > > So if you do an insert that doesn't provide a value for that column, > the nextval is done implicitly. Right, i know. You don't need call nextval _explicit_, okay? Andreas -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: