Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Дата
Msg-id 200904211630.n3LGUbA09550@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Ответы Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>  
> > \df[S+] [PATTERN]      list functions
> > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN]  list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>  
> Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces?  Like maybe:
>  
> \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN]  list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>  
> Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might
> be adequate.

Agreed.  The problem is I don't see curly braces used anywhere in \?,
but now that I look at it it is just because there is no need for them. 
How about this:
 \\df{antw}[S+] [PATRN]  list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions

In a way though, they are really still optional, they are just not
optional for this specific line.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df