Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20090421161957.GP10358@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions
> > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe:
>
> \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might
> be adequate.
I suggested this to Bruce over IM:
\df[antw][S+] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions
(one line only, removing the second redundant line). This seems
clea[nr]er to me. Bruce says it would confuse users. But really, if
you can understand the [S+] stuff you should be able to get the [antw]
stuff too, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: