Re: Unicode support
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: Unicode support
Дата
Msg-id
200904141532.44618.peter_e@gmx.net
Ответ на
Re: Unicode support (Andrew Dunstan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Unicode support - - <crossroads0000@googlemail.com>
Re: Unicode support Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Unicode support "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Unicode support Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Unicode support Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unicode support Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Unicode support Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unicode support Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unicode support "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Unicode support Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Unicode support Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unicode support "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: Unicode support Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Unicode support - - <crossroads0000@googlemail.com>
Re: Unicode support Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unicode support "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Unicode support Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Unicode support Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unicode support Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Unicode support Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unicode support - - <crossroads0000@googlemail.com>
Re: Unicode support Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Unicode support Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: Unicode support Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unicode support Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: Unicode support Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Unicode support Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unicode support Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Unicode support Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unicode support Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
On Monday 13 April 2009 22:39:58 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Umm, but isn't that because your encoding is using one code point? > > See the OP's explanation w.r.t. canonical equivalence. > > This isn't about the number of bytes, but about whether or not we should > count characters encoded as two or more combined code points as a single > char or not. Here is a test case that shows the problem (if your terminal can display combining characters (xterm appears to work)): SELECT U&'\00E9', char_length(U&'\00E9');?column? | char_length ----------+-------------é | 1 (1 row) SELECT U&'\0065\0301', char_length(U&'\0065\0301');?column? | char_length ----------+-------------é | 2 (1 row)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления