On Thursday 02 April 2009 6:16:44 pm Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
>
> Now I remember. Its something that trips me up, the RECORD in RETURN setof
> RECORD is not the same thing as the RECORD in DECLARE RECORD. See below for
> a better explanation-
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/plpgsql-declarations.html#PL
>PGSQL-DECLARATION-RECORDS Note that RECORD is not a true data type, only a
> placeholder. One should also realize that when a PL/pgSQL function is
> declared to return type record, this is not quite the same concept as a
> record variable, even though such a function might use a record variable to
> hold its result. In both cases the actual row structure is unknown when the
> function is written, but for a function returning record the actual
> structure is determined when the calling query is parsed, whereas a record
> variable can change its row structure on-the-fly.
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> aklaver@comcast.net
For this particular case the following works.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_function(integer) RETURNS record AS $Body$
DECLARE croid integer;
DECLARE R RECORD;
BEGINSELECT INTO croid 2;SELECT INTO R croid,$1;
RETURN R;
END;
$Body$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver@comcast.net