Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Дата
Msg-id 200903230951.17352.dfontaine@hi-media.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Monday 23 March 2009 04:05:04 Andrew Gierth wrote:
>  Dimitri> Heard about http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ExtensionPackaging ?
> Yes, I left a short note on its discussion page a while ago :-)

Hehe... I'll answer here, as it's a more opened forum it seems...

Schemas vs Extensions (or modules, we'll see): yes they are orthogonal
concepts, but still, extensions should not pollute the public namespace, I
(and some other) think.

So we're encouraging extension's authors to use their own schema where to put
the extension stuff, with the drawback that user would have to remember about
it and manage it along with their own schemas, which cause search_path issues.

I think your idea of splitting search_path into several components would help
a lot here.
--
dim

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Следующее
От: KaiGai Kohei
Дата:
Сообщение: [PATCH] SE-PostgreSQL for v8.5 development (r1769)