Re: Over-rigidity in recent to_timestamp() rewrite

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:39:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Whilst poking at bug #4702 I noticed that PG CVS HEAD rejects use of
> AD/BC notation, as well as CC (separate century) fields, in
> combination with ISO-style day numbers.  I don't see the point of
> this.  It's historically inaccurate, no doubt, but so is use of
> Gregorian counting.  So I suggest the attached fix.  Does this make
> anyone unhappy?

Works for me :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate