Re: Over-rigidity in recent to_timestamp() rewrite

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: Over-rigidity in recent to_timestamp() rewrite
Дата
Msg-id 20090314180939.GC29602@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Over-rigidity in recent to_timestamp() rewrite  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:39:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Whilst poking at bug #4702 I noticed that PG CVS HEAD rejects use of
> AD/BC notation, as well as CC (separate century) fields, in
> combination with ISO-style day numbers.  I don't see the point of
> this.  It's historically inaccurate, no doubt, but so is use of
> Gregorian counting.  So I suggest the attached fix.  Does this make
> anyone unhappy?

Works for me :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Over-rigidity in recent to_timestamp() rewrite
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?