Re: Is this possible?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От johnf
Тема Re: Is this possible?
Дата
Msg-id 200902170620.36108.jfabiani@yolo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is this possible?  ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>)
Ответы Re: Is this possible?  ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>)
Список pgsql-sql
On Monday 16 February 2009 10:32:26 pm A. Kretschmer wrote:
> In response to johnf :
> > Hi,
> > I'm not to sure this is possible.
> >
> > I need to replace a primary key (pkid) with the value of a different
> > field. I have
> > pkid = 200
> > attendid = 301
> >
> > I need the pkid = 301
> >
> > But there may or may not be a pkid that already exist that has the value
> > of 301.  The attendid is unique and the pkid data type is serial (has a
> > sequence).
> >
> > Thanks for the help.
>
> You can do that within a transaction and dropping the pk-constraint:
>
> test=*# \d foo
>                          Table "public.foo"
>  Column |  Type   |                    Modifiers
> --------+---------+--------------------------------------------------
>  id     | integer | not null default nextval('foo_id_seq'::regclass)
>  i      | integer |
> Indexes:
>     "foo_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
>     "foo_i_key" UNIQUE, btree (i)
>
> test=*# select * from foo;
>  id | i
> ----+---
>   1 | 2
>   2 | 1
>   3 | 3
> (3 rows)
>
> test=*# alter table foo drop constraint foo_pkey;
> ALTER TABLE
> test=*# update foo set id=i;
> UPDATE 3
> test=*# alter table foo add primary key(id);
> NOTICE:  ALTER TABLE / ADD PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
> "foo_pkey" for table "foo" ALTER TABLE
> test=*# \d foo
>                          Table "public.foo"
>  Column |  Type   |                    Modifiers
> --------+---------+--------------------------------------------------
>  id     | integer | not null default nextval('foo_id_seq'::regclass)
>  i      | integer |
> Indexes:
>     "foo_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
>     "foo_i_key" UNIQUE, btree (i)
>
> test=*# select * from foo;
>  id | i
> ----+---
>   2 | 2
>   1 | 1
>   3 | 3
> (3 rows)
>
>
> HTH, Andreas

Wow that looks like it will work - thanks.  
When you say 'within a transaction'  do you mean starting with 
"Begin" and using "commit"?

-- 
John Fabiani


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Steve Nyemba
Дата:
Сообщение: Stored Procedure Generator?
Следующее
От: "A. Kretschmer"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is this possible?