Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 13:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Right, that's what I meant --- do all the work within pg_dump.
> >
> > > Is this acceptable to everyone? We could name the option
> > > -u/--upgrade-compatible.
> >
> > If the switch is specifically for pg_upgrade support (enabling this as
> > well as any other hacks we find necessary), which seems like a good
> > idea, then don't chew up a short option letter for it. There should be
> > a long form only. And probably not even list it in the user
> > documentation.
>
> Why wouldn't we want to list it?
Because it is for internal use by upgrade utilities, not for user use.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +