Re: binary array and record recv
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: binary array and record recv |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200901271407.27657.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: binary array and record recv (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: binary array and record recv
Re: binary array and record recv |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 18:30:22 Tom Lane wrote: > Arguably, pg_dump from an older version should make sure that the auto > rules should NOT get created, else it is failing to preserve an older > view's behavior. We extend properties of objects all the time. That is why we make new releases. No one is required to use the new properties. Should pg_dump also make sure that tables imported from an older version are not usable for recursive unions or window functions, thus preserving the older table's behavior?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: