Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Hm, how about just 'partition'?  Your argument is fair, and another
> point in its favor is that someday we'll probably have an explicit
> notion of partitioned tables and both the inheritance and union-view
> approaches would become legacy methods.  We'd certainly want constraint
> exclusion to apply to all three by default.

'partition' works for me.
Thanks!
    Stephen