"D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain <darcy@druid.net> writes:
> Speaking of which, I wonder what Paul would say about the primary key
> discussion. Maybe I'll drop him a note.
Good thought, if he's not reading the mailing list anymore (which seems
likely given the volume...).
I still assert that indexes need to behave the same as the comparison
operators --- but maybe the comparison operators ought to behave
differently for INET and CIDR types? It seems reasonable that
the netmask should be ignored when comparing one, but not the other...
regards, tom lane