Re: dblink vs SQL/MED

On Saturday 20 December 2008 19:33:17 Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> > SQL/MED catalog manipulation facilities
> >
> > This doesn't do any remote or external things yet, but it gives modules
> > like plproxy and dblink a standardized and future-proof system for
> > managing their connection information.
>
> It seems this is a pile of pretty useless code, so far as the core
> distribution is concerned, unless somebody fixes dblink to use it.
> Is that on anyone's radar for 8.4?

Martin had sent some code for that with his original patch series.  I or 
someone can review that next.