[I|S]CONST/[I|S]const in gram.y
| От | Michael Meskes |
|---|---|
| Тема | [I|S]CONST/[I|S]const in gram.y |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20081110102435.GA6166@feivel.credativ.de обсуждение |
| Ответы |
Re: [I|S]CONST/[I|S]const in gram.y
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, is there a reason why we sometimes use ICONST and SCONST directly in a rule in gram.y yet in other rules use Iconst and Sconst which in turn resolve to ICONST and SCONST? Some rules even use ICONST and Sconst, so there does not be any consistency. If this has no reason I'd like to make all rules use the same symbol which will make gram.y be consequent in its symbol usage and simplify my work to generate the ecpg parser out of an unchanged gram.y at the same time. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: