Re: Block-level CRC checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Block-level CRC checks
Дата
Msg-id 20081107191140.GE5507@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Hmm, oh I see another problem here -- the bit is not restored when
> > replayed heap_update's WAL record.  I'm now wondering what other bits
> > are set without much care about correctly restoring them during replay.
>
> I'm now wondering whether it'd be easier to just ignore pd_flags in
> calculating the checksum.

Okay, so this is what I've done.  pd_flags is skipped.  Also the WAL
routine logs both HeapTupleHeader infomasks and ItemId->lp_flags.  On
the latter point I'm not 100% sure of the cases where lp_flags must be
logged; right now I'm only logging if the item is marked as "having
storage" (the logic being that if an item does not have storage, then
making it have requires a WAL entry, and vice versa).

(This version has some debugging log entries which are obviously only
WIP material.)

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Distinct types
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RRR] Tests citext casts