Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > [Also there is a comment saying "this is a bug" in autovacuum.c
> > Are we thinking to go production with that phrase in the code?]
>
> Yeah, well, it's only a comment ;-) The problem is that a worker can
> decide that a table needs to be vacuumed, if another worker has finished
> vacuuming it in the last 500 ms. I proposed a mechanism to close the
> hole but it was too much of a hassle.
I just committed a patch that should fix this problem.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support