Re: How to handle C&D's?
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How to handle C&D's? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20081024150532.GD5539@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | How to handle C&D's? (Joshua Kramer <josh@globalherald.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:14:12AM -0400, Joshua Kramer wrote: > Has anybody thought about how you'd handle a C&D in terms of communicating > to users? If somebody at Bob's House of IP Enforcers sends someone on the > PG team a C&D that says Feature XYZ violates their patent, and it is found > to be true by the PG team - then what? I think such cases have to be dealt with case by case, for exactly the reasons that the rest of your message discusses. And the cost of doing this case by case, and the way that would (fail to) scale, is exactly the reason I think it's a bad idea to go looking for the trouble. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@commandprompt.com +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: