Re: Unicode escapes in literals

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:04:43PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Man that's ugly.  Why the ampersand?
>
> Yeah, excellent question.  It seems completely unnecessary, but it is 
> surely there in the syntax diagram.

Probably because many Unicode representations are done with "U+"
followed by 4-6 hexadecimal units, but "+" is problematic for other
reasons (in some vendor's implementation)?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/