Re: minimal update

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 06:05:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> >> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >>> "Minimal" really fails to convey the point here IMHO.  How about
> >>> something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"?
> 
> > I think it means something to us, but "no op" is a very technical phrase
> > that probably doesn't travel very well.
> 
> Agreed --- I was hoping someone could improve on that part.  The only
> other words I could come up with were "empty" and "useless", neither of
> which seem quite le mot juste ...
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
redundant?

Ken