On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:03:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"
> > />
>
> You saw that in our CVS HTML file that is part of the source
> distribution? That is the master copy.
No, that's my point. When I look at the web page source, it's UTF-8.
And since that's the only realistic way to have the framework document
around the FAQ, it seems reasonable to me.
> I see lots of FAQs in CVS that are not UTF8:
>
> FAQ.html: <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
This doesn't matter, because US-ASCII is a proper subset of UTF-8.
> FAQ_brazilian.html: <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
This doesn't need to change because the bottom range of Unicode was made
the same as ISO 8859-1 in order to make the transition somewhat easier.
> FAQ_polish.html: <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-2">
> FAQ_russian.html: <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=koi8-r">
> FAQ_turkish.html: <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso8859-9">
>
> Do they all have to be converted?
Those three do, I expect. They sure look like it on the page. All
sorts of "?" in there.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/