Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements

Tom Lane wrote:
> Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:

> I didn't get much further than that because I got discouraged after
> looking at the locking issues around the pending-insertions list.
> It's a mess:

These are rather severe problems.  Maybe there's a better solution, but
perhaps it would be good enough to lock out concurrent access to the
index while the bulkinsert procedure is working.




-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.