What is our plan for pgindent for 8.4? I would rather not have to bug
someone to create a list of symbols manually. I would like it to be
built on a regular basis and I can pull it from there and add it to CVS
when I run pgindent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> >
> >
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>
> >>> doxygen's 200-some is clearly an order of magnitude too low, but I
> >>> wonder whether Bruce's list hasn't got some false hits ...
> >>>
> >
> > Skimming the output it does have things like "int" and "float" but presumably
> > we would know if that caused any problem, they wouldn't inflate the numbers
> > much.
> >
> >
> >> 2800 does seem a bit high. My buildfarm member dungbeetle just found 2482 on a
> >> build that is only missing the optional pam, bonjour and gssapi config options.
> >>
> >
> > The numbers going to vary heavily from OS to OS so it seems to me that these
> > are a basically the same order of magnitude.
> >
>
> It looks like Windows will blow all our existing numbers out of the
> water. Here's a list generated from Cygwin with 6088 symbols. I'm
> working on getting a similar list from MinGW.
>
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=brown_bat&dt=2008-04-18%20230054&stg=typedefs
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +