Re: pg_dump restore time and Foreign Keys

On Sunday 08 June 2008 20:12:15 Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > and i'm sure no one is against that idea, but you're never going to be
> > able to match the performance of just avoiding the check.
>
> We'll never be able to match the performance of not having transactions,
> either, but the community has never for a moment considered having a
> "no transactions" mode.
>

it's unclear what a "no transaction" mode would mean, but I'd be willing to 
guess some people have consider aspects of it (we've just never had 
agreement)

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL