Re: Overhauling GUCS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Treat
Тема Re: Overhauling GUCS
Дата
Msg-id 200806061602.31641.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Overhauling GUCS  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Ответы Re: Overhauling GUCS
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 05 June 2008 15:15:14 Greg Smith wrote:
> (1) is in that proposal but is strictly optional as something to put in
> the configuration file itself.  The idea behind (2) is to enable tool
> authors to have an easier way to suggest where to head for more
> information.  I'd like for it to be trivial for a tool to say "Suggested
> value for <x> is <y>; see
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html
> for more information".  I know what most of the settings I tinker with do,
> but even I'd like it to be easier to find the right spot in the manual;
> for newbies it's vital.  You are correct that (2) isn't strictly necessary
> here, but it's valuable and will be easier to wrap into this than to bolt
> on later.
>

One idea I have been kicking around is having every guc have a anchor in the 
website (rahter than anchoring on parameter family).  It might be enough to 
just populate the search bot with every guc anchored to family though... 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Следующее
От: "Jignesh K. Shah"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: New LWLockmode LW_OWNER