Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Silently not locking is surely
> > >> not very safe.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Here is the dump code version of the patch. If anyone wants the
> > > return value idea, let me know.
> >
> > So is this a patch we want applied?
>
> Please see my other thread about libpq thread-locking which should be
> finished before this one, after which this patch will change. So no,
> this is not the version to be applied.
I've applied a version of this to make libpq use CRITICAL_SECTION on
win32.
//Magnus