Re: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Treat
Тема Re: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search
Дата
Msg-id 200804251724.48705.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search
Список pgsql-performance
On Monday 21 April 2008 12:54, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > Unfortunatly I don't have the 8.1 system to bang on anymore for this,
> > (though anecdotaly speaking, I never saw this behavior in 8.1) however I
> > do now have a parallel 8.3 system crunching the data, and it is showing
> > the same symptom (yes, 2 8.3 servers, crunching the same data, both
> > bogged down now), so I do feel this is something specific to 8.3.
> >
> > I am mostly wondering if anyone else has encountered behavior like this
> > on 8.3 (large sets of insert....update exception block in plpgsql bogging
> > down), or if anyone has any thoughts on which direction I should poke at
> > it from here. TIA.
>
> Perhaps what you could do is backpatch the change and see if the problem
> goes away.

So, after some more digging, we ended up backpatching the change. Results as
follows:

= hanging job before patch

     elapsed     |                         status
-----------------+--------------------------------------------------------
 00:00:00.024075 | OK/starting with 2008-04-25 08:20:02
 00:00:00.611411 | OK/processing 624529 hits up until 2008-04-25 10:20:02
 03:48:02.748319 | ??/Processed 65000 aggregated rows so far
(3 rows)

= successful job after patch

     elapsed     |                         status
-----------------+---------------------------------------------------------
 00:00:00.026809 | OK/starting with 2008-04-25 08:20:02
 00:00:03.921532 | OK/processing 2150115 hits up until 2008-04-25 15:00:02
 00:24:45.439081 | OK/Processed 334139 aggregated rows
 00:00:00.019433 | OK/
(4 rows)

Note the second run had to do all the rows from the first run, plus additional
rows that accumulated while the first job was running.

Oddly some dtrace profiling gave me this, which is pretty different, but
certainly doesn't have concerns about TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId

<snip>
postgres`hash_search_with_hash_value                      536   2.3%
postgres`SearchCatCache                                   538   2.3%
postgres`hash_seq_search                                  577   2.4%
postgres`MemoryContextAllocZeroAligned                    610   2.6%
postgres`_bt_compare                                      671   2.8%
libc.so.1`memcpy                                          671   2.8%
postgres`XLogInsert                                       755   3.2%
postgres`LockReassignCurrentOwner                         757   3.2%
postgres`base_yyparse                                    1174   5.0%
postgres`AllocSetAlloc                                   1244   5.3%

We still have one of our 8.3 servers running stock 8.3.1, so we'll see how
long before this bites us again.  Would certainly be nice to get this fixed
in the mainline code.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Planner won't use composite index if there is an order by ????
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search