Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)
Дата
Msg-id 20080420114816.42f779ab@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)
Список pgsql-general
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:32:58 -0600
"Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:

> Exactly.  There are several things you can do on the replica that you
> wouldn't do on the master for better performance.  Really big numbers
> of WAL segments, no background writer, fsync off as mentioned, WAL on
> a RAID-0 with 10 disks, no battery back on a caching RAID controller,
> and so on.

You are still limited by how fast you can pull data from the master
over the network to the slave. Which when dealing with 500GB+ is a
significant limitation.

Joshua D. Drake


--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Wall
Дата:
Сообщение: JDBC addBatch more efficient?
Следующее
От: "Scott Marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)