Chris Browne wrote:
> >> Would it be a terrible idea to...
> >>
> >> - Draw the indent code from NetBSD into src/tools/pgindent
> >> - Build it _in place_ inside the code tree (e.g. - don't assume
> >> it will get installed in /usr/local/bin)
> >> - Thus have the ability to run it in place?
> >
> > Yes, but it bloats our code and people still need to generate the
> > typedefs and follow the instructions. The other problem is if they run
> > it on a file they have modified, it is going to adjust places they
> > didn't touch, thereby making the patch harder to review.
>
> The bloat is 154K, on a project with something around 260MB of code.
> I don't think this is a particlarly material degree of bloat.
You mean 37kb vs 13MB, right? That is the tarball sizes I see.
> If we ran pgindent really frequently, there would admittedly be the
> difference that there would be a lot of little cases of
> changes-from-pgindent being committed along the way, but [1] might it
> not be cheaper to accept that cost, with the concomittant benefit that
> you could tell patchers "Hey, run pgindent before submitting that
> patch, and that'll clean up a number of of the issues." Yes, it
> doesn't address code changes like typedef generation, but that never
> was an argument against running pgindent...
That is much a more radical use of pgindent than it has had in the past
but it is certainly possible.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +