Re: pgwin32_safestat weirdness

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > I would be quite happy with that, but before we go down that path
> > I'd like to know why the MSVC builds aren't failing now from this
> > when the MinGW builds are.
> 
> Maybe the MSVC linker is willing to bind libpq's call to a safestat
> copy extracted from libpgport.a in the surrounding program --- IOW,
> it works only for calling programs that include libpgport, but all
> ours do.

Actually, on msvc we link libpq against libpgport, and not the
individual files. Since we have a defined export list, it should remove
all the unused functions automatically.

//Magnus