On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:13:55 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> AFAIK Postgres is an official alias, so I don't see the point.
> Besides, the -core decision said AFAIR that we would stick to the
> name PostgreSQL *for now*, with an eye to an eventual switch to
> Postgres as we went making the latter name better known (i.e. using
> it).
No that was not the decision. See the archives for the official core
response from Dave Page.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate