Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> BTW, Greg Stark already dumped the patch queue into a wiki page some
> time ago: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:Bruce Do you think
> that's more useful than the other commitfest layout? I don't.
No.
The bottom line is that I used to do this tracking in my own mailboxes
but people wanted to see what was outstanding so the web pages were
created.
Basically a Wiki takes 10x more time for me to modify something, so
unless I get another 9 people to do the same amount of work I do on
tracking, we are going to fall behind. I am not willing to increase the
amount of time I already spend doing this. Perhaps distributed over the
community there will be 9x more time spent on tracking, but I doubt it.
I think ultimately we are going to have to remove the patches email list
and require patch submitters to add their patches to a patch tracker.
Then all patch discussion will happen on hackers and in the patch
tracker. I will continue to gather TODO emails, but those are not
time-sensitive and few people seem to want to work on that.
Frankly, few people seem to want to apply patches either. :-) Even
with two patch queue web sites, Tom is doing the bulk of the work. I
kept some of the easy ones in the queue for a long time hoping people
would at least take those, but no one did. I am doing them at this
point because we want this commit fest to be over.
Also frankly, I feel I am hearing, "Oh, we want to help but we don't
know what to do", and when you show people what to do, they don't help.
Yes, I am disapointed. If someone can explain why I shouldn't feel
disapointed, I would love to hear it.
If you want I will take my web pages offline and the community can see
how it does with tracking. I will keep my mbox current just in case.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +