Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query

Tomas Doran wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2008, at 17:23, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> Perhaps we could name it received_query() to indicate it is what the
>> backend received and it not necessarily the _current_ query.
>
> reveived_query() sounds like a very sane name for me, and documenting it 
> as such would allow you to expose the functionality without the possible 
> complaints...

client_query perhaps?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support