Hello, all
> not important, is it one rule like:
> create rule v_del as on delete to v do instead (
> delete from o1 where id = old.o1_id;
> delete from o2 where id = old.o2_id;
> );
>
> or split into two rule like:
> create rule v_del1 as on delete to v do instead (
> delete from o1 where id = old.o1_id;
> );
> create rule v_del2 as on delete to v do instead (
> delete from o2 where id = old.o2_id;
> );
Sorry, after thinking some time about this problem now i may be understand what going on there... %)
When first rule was exec - no OLD row anymore in "v" view, nothing will be joined and in second rule
OLD value is empty... so my question is changed to: is this expected behavior or a bug ? %)
---