-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:23:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> The idea that's becoming attractive to me while contemplating the
> >>> multiple-maps problem is that we should adopt something similar to
> >>> the old Mac OS idea of multiple "forks" in a relation.
>
> > Can we call them "maps" or "metadata maps"? "forks" sounds weird.
Actually, I do like "forks", but to add a little bit diversity:
facets? aspects?
FWIW, the idea of mapping a relation to a directory quite compelling.
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH33c7Bcgs9XrR2kYRAuBQAJ9MjISqgn37umRIydxtUBYONORwDgCbBKkE
y7adUy7s/30TxQPQiJZZejA=
=PAQ9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----