-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:05:10 -0400 (EDT)
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
>
> > A silly question in this context: If we know of a company that
> > does use PostgreSQL but doesn't list it anywhere ... can we take
> > the liberty to publicise this somewhere anyway?
>
> Bad idea.
Very bad idea.
> There are companies who consider being listed as a user of
> a product a sort of recommendation of that technology, and
> accordingly they will get really annoyed if you do that when they
> didn't give you permission. This has actually happened, where
> someone has asked to be removed from the list of those using
> PostgreSQL.
Yes it has.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH2fpEATb/zqfZUUQRAjktAJ9ApY2Mgtylm5Ud13wAIjoDhudfOACeNgQv
cuEmfQ3IT3MtPoPcdazXwKw=
=7NTF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----