Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Дата
Msg-id 20080311133245.2660c557@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > > Particularly consider using psql to restore a pg_dump
> > > dump --- are we going to add "SET statement_timeout=0"
> > > to the pg_dump file?
> > 
> > I hope not. That should be the user's choice.
> 
> Would anyone want to limit the load time for pg_dump?   I can hardly
> see why.

I have to agree with Bruce here. You restore a backup because your
hosed something or you are building a dev environment. These are both
boolean results that should end in TRUE :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate     PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of
Dolphins

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH1uxyATb/zqfZUUQRAvyWAKCATrKgRQygjveXSrY0KIptvKYZJQCgg87z
XrXncZ8d2Qyf61Wtc+OtHXg=
=rBaK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout