Re: [HACKERS] Fix for large file support (nonsegment mode support)

Tom Lane wrote:
> I think this needs to be treated as experimental until it's got a few
> more than zero miles under its belt.

OK, then maybe we should document that.

> I wouldn't be too surprised to
> find that we have to implement it as a run-time switch instead of
> compile-time, in order to not fail miserably when somebody sticks a
> tablespace on an archaic filesystem.

Yes, that sounds quite useful.  Let's wait and see what happens.