-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:54 -0800
Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote:
> We're upgrading to a medium-sized server, a Dell PowerEdge 2950,
> dual-quad CPU's and 8 GB memory. This box can hold at most 8 disks
> (10K SCSI 2.5" 146 GB drives) and has Dell's Perc 6/i RAID controller.
>
> I'm thinking of this:
>
> 6 disks RAID 1+0 Postgres data
> 1 disk WAL
> 1 disk Linux
>
> I've often seen RAID 1 recommended for the WAL. Is that strictly for
> reliability, or is there a performance advantage to RAID 1 for the
> WAL?
>
> It seems to me separating the OS and WAL on two disks is better than
> making a single RAID 1 and sharing it, from a performance point of
> view.
This scares me... You lose WAL you are a goner. Combine your OS and
WAL into a RAID 1.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHycSzATb/zqfZUUQRAs14AJ9pm3huW+z1j7jUIY7FbIZMzz2IxgCgnOhD
yWiDabTYAG+x12JEqrf4q8E=
=gBPs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----