Thomas Chille wrote:
> My 1. question is,
> if the known bugfixes for autovacuum after release 8.1.4 addressing my
> depicted issues?
Not directly, but keep reading.
> We are still using 8.1.4 because a database upgrade for us and our
> product is a hefty step wich involves a lot of customer databases. But
> if it could help we consider to upgrade to 8.1.11 or 8.3. What would u
> suggest?
You will be really happy when your database stops working because of a
bug in autovacuum which was fixed in 8.1.6. I should add that perhaps
autovacuum is not processing your databases at all because it is stuck
on processing template0 due to that bug -- this could cause dead rows to
accumulate.
I'm not sure why you say it's a hefty step to upgrade to 8.1.11.
Perhaps you're not up to speed on our upgrade procedures.
On the other hand, perhaps this bug hasn't bit you yet. But I can
promise, if you don't upgrade it will.
> My 2. questions is,
> if i possible configured something improper?
If you didn't tune autovacuum at all, yeah, perhaps it would be good to
adjust the settings somewhat.
> My 3. question is,
> if it possible to read the vaccuming or analyzing state of a given
> table manually? Are there any indicatores in statistic tables, wich
> the autovacuum demaon is using too wich can show me the progress of a
> running autovacuum?
Yes, they are kept in pg_stat_all_tables. (Not all autovacuum numbers
are displayed however).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support