Re: Good F/OSS license summary
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Good F/OSS license summary |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20080201193146.GD10889@crankycanuck.ca обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Good F/OSS license summary (Reece Hart <reece@harts.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:17:19AM -0800, Reece Hart wrote: > > Does anyone know of an authoritative, complete, and current license > comparison? After a lot of trolling, I've been able to satisfy one or > two of those criteria, but not all. The FSF has maintained a list of many licenses for years. It's at <http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/>. Certified Open Source Initiative licenses are listed at <http://opensource.org/licenses>. I think those are the two main resources for this topic. > It's disappointing that we as a community have yet to converge on just a > few licenses that differ only by the few characteristics that *really* > matter (e.g., virality, commercializability, code Your problem in the above is that your definitions of "community" and "really matter" may not be congruent with others'. A
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: