-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:01:26 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:45:43 -0500 (EST)
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > One week later and this web site remains unchanged. :-(
> > >
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/faq
> >
> > Who controls the FAQ?
>
> I would like to know myself. I assume Josh Berkus but am just
> guessing. Can we just remove the last three items on that page?
O.k. just so I am 100% clear :) We are talking about the /press/faq
right? If so... IMO the following needs to happen:
The press FAQ should be a section (internal ref of course) within the
general FAQ as I am guessing there is some significant overlap.
I believe that press should be replaced with the word Advocacy or maybe
Advocacy & Press.
All redundant information should be removed between the general and
press advocacy sections.
Add a section on the FAQ page for the Advocacy & Press section that
links to the section within the general FAQ.
Appropriate rewrites put in place to push all requests for the old FAQ
to the new (and proper) one.
Thoughts?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHn14uATb/zqfZUUQRAm+dAKCYmChuh6HQfl49AGE67FVwGTovHgCfdAiy
YWoVgXBqu3rbB3H1spBZthc=
=3H8K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----