Re: pg_dump and languages
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump and languages |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20077.1101510670@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and languages (Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and languages
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net> writes:
> Sorry should have been more explicit. The dump loaded functions depending on
> plsh before the function that created the language. In fact it did not
> instalI the language at all.
Ah. Looking back at your first message, I see you'd installed plsh into
the pg_catalog schema rather than a user schema. pg_dump specifically
doesn't dump anything that appears in pg_catalog; it assumes all of that
stuff is supplied by the system. So the above is expected behavior.
I haven't looked at plsh, but if it installs stuff directly into
pg_catalog, I'd call that a mistake. At least it shouldn't be the
default behavior.
(Note for pedantry's sake: a language doesn't really belong to any
particular schema; but its support functions do, and pg_dump treats
the language as belonging to the same schema as the support functions.)
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: