Re: pgindent issue with EXEC_BACKEND-only typedefs

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't know how to make it output the symbol names like it seems to do
> for you.
> 
> Having the typedef list in the script itself seems like a barrier for
> other people to contribute to this thing.  I wonder if that can be
> changed so that the typedef is on a separate list.

Done and committed.

> (Why are we still distributing pgjindent anyway?)

Removed.

> I am also wondering if current GNU indent is now better suited to the
> task.  Perhaps the bugs that it had on earlier versions have since been
> fixed?  I remember checking the source code size a couple of years ago
> and it had grown by an order of magnitude or something like that.

Yes, we should give that another try.  I will keep this as an 8.4 item.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +