-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:46:15 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > > I would suggest forgetting that part and submitting the part
> > > that has some chance of getting accepted.
> >
> >
> > Actually i want to submit the patch, which is best according to me.
> >
You do need to be able to be able to feel that your work is up to a
standard that you find redeemable. However...
> That's not an attitude that is likely to succeed - you need to take
> suggestions from Tom very seriously.
Andrew is absolutely correct here. If you do not agree with Tom, you
best prove why. Otherwise your patch will likely be ignored on
submission.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHaWj9ATb/zqfZUUQRAqsNAJ9k6p0z7rQEcqal0JoKw/ZZG8h5kACfaB9y
xQJ4O+h1xe947O1gnTLEbTU=
=WaSW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----