Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:55:33AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are nonsensical -- we know this is not a device, nor
> > network access. Still there is more than one possibility, and I don't
> > know which ones should be really acceptable in this context or not.
> > (What's ERROR_FAIL_I24??) SHARING_VIOLATION seems the most likely
> > problem; an antivirus perhaps?
>
> If you have an antivirus running on the system, you really should get rid
> of taht long before you start looking at the code...
FWIW I noticed by accident that the latest stable version of a
not-competing database system has fixed a related bug:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=9709
(yes, it only took them two and a half years to fix it).
Note that their behavior on finding SHARING_VIOLATION or LOCK_VIOLATION
is to retry forever until the error goes away, on the theory that the
antivirus/backup software will soon release the file.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"Someone said that it is at least an order of magnitude more work to do
production software than a prototype. I think he is wrong by at least
an order of magnitude." (Brian Kernighan)