Gregory Stark wrote:
> I understand the thinking but I disagree that "various optimizations speeding
> up merge sort, reducing contention at transaction start and end, ..." is
> entirely content-free. I agree that nobody is really going to be specifically
> saying "gee, i wish we could use postgres but merge-join is just too slow".
> However as a user I find it helpful to get a kind of overview of the kinds of
> invisible changes there were so I can get a feel for the magnitude of the
> improvements between versions.
Agreed. You will have to convince Tom because it was mostly such items
from him in previous release that he asked to be removed.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +