Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:41:20PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:39:04PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:26:15 -0800
> > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Best practices for partitioning so far have shown that TRIGGERs are
> > > better than RULEs for most cases.  Please find attached a patch which
> > > reflects this.
> > >
> > > Thanks to Robert Treat for help putting this together :)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > David.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Joshua D. Drake
>
> Per Robert, I've also dropped the UNION partitioning suggestion as
> it's pretty useless.

Oops.  Patch including *both* changes attached this time.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate