-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:22:03 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:41:00PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > If a change of definition is desired, then perhaps the EU list is
> > the right place to discuss it? My view may not be that of the
> > majority.
>
> I don't think anyone is suggesting a change of definition.
I am certainly not asking that the eu group change the way it is doing
things.
> It is
> rather the description of the definition that is at issue. Perhaps
Exactly. I was confused and it led to an uncomfortable situation for
me. Instead of whining about it, I submitted a patch that I thought
would make it less likely for others to possibly make the same mistake.
> someone subscribed could ask on that list how the list describes
> itself, and someone could summarise that in a patch to the
> description? (I am not subscribed; and, being as I'm in Canada,
> don't intend to do.)
I will ask on their list. I had originally tried to unsubscribed but it
failed so... :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTaTbATb/zqfZUUQRAk1wAJ42FT0PP9w1HcsutbGhf6pz0lBoIgCeO/Rz
bcMN20jVk5VjN1ar3fHCbgM=
=YQaB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----