Re: Terminal width for help output

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sam Mason
Тема Re: Terminal width for help output
Дата
Msg-id 20071119213932.GP1955@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Terminal width for help output  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:56:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's 
> > \?)?  I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we 
> > have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
> 
> 79 is perfect IMHO.  It would be great to ask translators to preserve
> the constraint too.

I thought that <79 was good because if output was copied/pasted into an
email that didn't fold lines nicely then output wouldn't get immediately
mangled.

 Sam


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Guillaume Lelarge
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Terminal width for help output
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: elog levels for _redo failures